New Grading Policy

In the present , I would like to provide my arguments against the refreshful demolishing policy , whose nature is haphazard selection of wanders . In fact there argon two points of its fallibility : the fact that it tremendous measures pupils luck rather than their line up achievements and that it destroys the entire invention of teach as the process of gaining knowledge and skillsFirst of all , it is necessary to rove the term grade . According to the gentilityal Policies committal , grading is the briny symbolic method of recording the evaluation of a student s academic slaying (Educational Policies Committee , 1991 . Evaluation , in convolute , give the gate be defined as assessment of the honor of individual achievements , according to the existing statemental standards . Education , according to Fuhrma nn and Grasha (1983 , is the cargon of knowledge , skills and character of students through consecutive motivation (Fuhrmann and Grasha , 1983 ,.156As wiz can understand , the impudently grading policy does not set up the interrelation mingled with the student s academic attainments and performance and the symbolic mark , garner or figure . Those learners whose achievements are poorer have an opportunity to absorb higher dictates through random selection method , whereas more than successful and hard-working students might weaken in terms of grade . Consequently , one can sum up that the new policy actually measures the soul s luck , as the grade does not depend upon their efforts , skills or abilitiesFurthermore , given the definition of gentility , it is possible to assume that the new grading policy contradicts to the purpose of college or university studies . This principle of grading does not motivate students to develop the necessary knowledge and skills , as t heir performance is not fitly evaluated , i ! .e . the truth intimately the value of achievement is reprobate . Therefore , students , being conscious of the fact that the true instruction about their attainment result not be provided are unlikely to work on their academic performance and lapse the willingness to succeedTo sum up , a positive appraisal of one s achievements is amongst the major incentives in the education system . The learners thus are unlikely to become true professionals after this motivator is eliminated with the presentment of the new grading policyWorks citedEducational Policies Committee . Responsibility for mark and Grading Policy . 4 Apr 1991Fuhrmann , B . and Grasha , A . A functional Handbook for College Teachers Boston : superficial Brown , 1993PAGEPAGE 2...If you want to drive a full essay, severalize it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay